Senate Bill 389 would eliminate the protection of Indiana’s state regulated, isolated, wetlands. Wetlands are critical to a healthy ecosystem. They are home to hundreds of species of plants and North American birds, many of which are endangered. Wetlands help keep our water clean by filtering sediment, chemicals, nutrients, and other harmful pollutants carried by stormwater runoff from reaching our waterways. They also work to recharge our aquifers by acting like giant sponges, soaking up floodwaters and slowly releasing them back into the ground. As you can see, wetlands are pretty important.
THE LATEST – 3/30/2021
— ACTION NEEDED! —
As you know, we have been among a core group of partners leading the fight against the devastating anti-wetland bill SB 389. To this end, we have authored a letter that lays out key facts, specific policy alternatives, and draws attention to relevant policy pitfalls. More than 75 organizations have signed onto this letter, with many more on the way. Signatories are being updated daily.
To date, the debate around SB 389 and its many Amendment variations have only focused on how many and which wetlands to deregulate. Other options need to be explored, or Indiana will lose these critical water resources and their water management functions. We need options focused on meeting various permit process challenges and situational grievances, not deregulation. Please share this solutions-based, science-based approach with your legislators. Key legislators to contact include House Speaker Representative Huston (email@example.com or 317-232-9677), House Environmental Affair Chair Representative Gutwein (firstname.lastname@example.org or 317-232-
9981), and Bill Sponsor Representative Lehman (email@example.com or 317-234-9380) and members of the House Environmental Affairs Committee.
Demand a more thoughtful approach to policy that affects our water supplies and our safety.
Learn more about our policy solution in this letter to our legislature. This letter also includes important, fact-checked information about the State’s In-lieu Fee Mitigation Program, as there have been widespread misrepresentations made about this program.
Please help us shift the policy discussion away from deregulation and toward thoughtful policy that best serves all Hoosiers.
The Committee vote is Monday, April 5. Several different amendments to 389 are circulating among the Committee members. To our knowledge, they all still focus on various degrees of deregulation, which is an unacceptable outcome.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
URGENT Action Needed, Again
We’ve been meeting one-on-one with several members of the House of Representatives alongside several other conservation partners. Unfortunately, while these meetings provided some assurances that SB 389 would be amended through a negotiation process with IDEM and that we would have ample time to seek diverse input on the content of that amendment before it went to a committee hearing, that commitment has not been honored. We are now in a scramble to rally opposition on a dangerous amendment released late yesterday, led by Senator Garten. The original bill was a full repeal of state-regulated wetland protections, yet despite widespread and diverse public and professional outcry, the amendment (in its 11th variation) is essentially the full repeal in a different wrapper, and it’s scheduled for hearing on Monday (3/22) at 10:30.
WE NEED YOUR URGENT HELP TO CONTACT MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE NOW AND TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON SB 389 AND AMENDMENT 11. Contact members of the House Environmental Affairs Committee. You can find their contact info here.
If you are able and interested in testifying Monday in-person, please do. Many and diverse voices are needed!
During our meetings with the Representatives, we tried to explain the many values of wetlands to our water supplies, water quality, and flood resiliency. We often found ourselves countering misunderstandings about the value of isolated wetlands, small wetlands, or wetlands that may be dominated by invasive plants. We continue to try to educate our public officials that critical wetland functions such as groundwater recharge, pollution abatement, and stormwater storage are in full effect regardless of a wetland’s connection to navigable waters, size, or plant diversity. AGAIN, WE NEED YOUR HELP to continue sharing these messages and letting our legislators know that ANY reduction in wetland protection is irrevocably damaging and short-sighted. We cannot afford to replace the critical (and expensive) water cycle services that our wetlands provide us all for the sake of short-term monetary benefits to a few.
We are in a critical phase of this bill’s trajectory. Contact members of the House Environmental Affairs Committee TODAY. Links to Legislators can be found below in the Indiana Legislators section.
SB 389 has been passed in the Senate. Now it’s on to the House of Representatives. Please take action and contact your Representative and ask them to vote ‘NO’ on this bill.
Not sure what’s fact or fiction about SB 389 and Indiana’s Isolated Wetlands? We (WRA), along with the Hoosier Environmental Council, have put together a list of some of the top myths out there regarding regulation of Indiana’s wetlands and done a little mythbusting for you.
Mythbusting on SB 389
In regards to Senate Bill 389, a letter of testimony from the White River Alliance to Chairman Messmer and Committee Members.
SB 389 WRA Testimony
An update from the White River Alliance regarding SB 389.
SB 389 Update
Contact information for 2021 Indiana Legislators can be found in the linked PDF documents listed below.
This innovative bill would encourage farm and woodland owner participation in carbon markets, through a technical assistance and carbon offset verification program administered by the Indiana State Department of Agriculture (ISDA). Carbon sequestration provided by carbon offset programs is a critical strategy in reducing the dangerous impacts of climate change.
The second element of the bill would generate new revenue for two state programs that help sequester carbon – 1.) the President Benjamin Harrison Conservation Trust buys new public lands for conservation and outdoor recreation purposes, including forest land. 2.) the Clean Water Indiana (CWI)—which helps farmers utilize best management practices to conserve soil and protect water quality.
The bill passed out of the Senate with a vote of 33 yeas and 16 nays and has been assigned to the House Natural Resources Committee. The bill has a hearing scheduled for Tuesday (3/23) at 11:30 am.
Contact members of the House Natural Resources Committee and the committee chair, Representative Sean Eberhart, and ask them to support the bill. You can find their contact info here.
This bill was originally proposed to establish watershed development commissions. These commissions were envisioned to be multi-county and would have been directed to answer specific questions related to flood control and drainage activities. The bill was amended in the House to assign the concept of exploring watershed development commissions to an interim study committee. The bill passed out of the House with a vote of 90 yeas and 3 nays. It was reassigned to Senate Appropriations Committee.
Contact members of the Senate Appropriations Committee and the committee chair, Senator Ryan Mishler, and ask them to hear the bill. You can find their contact info here.